Notwithstanding the legitimacy of the model from a scientific perspective, I do like the model as a lens or perspective for understanding consciousness. Similarly, the ‘triune brain’ model is great for understanding and explaining our behaviour.
I also like the server-client aspect of the bicameral model, and wonder what type of APIs might be used. What happens when either side fails to conform to the others’ API spec? Does it use TCP or UDP?
To clarify, popularized over-simplified descriptions of the left hemisphere being "analytical" and the right hemisphere being "creative" are inaccurate, but left/right hemisphere differences do exist and appear to exhibit consistently different approaches to things. The book 'The Master and His Emissary' covers the more recent research in that area, and is at least as interesting of a read as 'The Bicameral Mind' was.
Unless you have a specific set of scathing reviews in mind, the reviews of it in the literature don't really appear to match up with that characterization very much:
> it is worth noting that the book has been much praised by neuro-scientists as diverse as Ramachandran, Panksepp, Hellige, Kesselring, Schore, Bynum, Zeman, Feinberg, Trimble and Lishman.
It'd be surprising if it were poorly received regardless, because the book itself is little more than a review of the relevant literature on the topic, packed with references, and some added philosophy about it's implications sprinkled on top. Not that much different from one of Michael Gazzaniga's popular books, and certainly not as out there as Julian Jaynes.
I also like the server-client aspect of the bicameral model, and wonder what type of APIs might be used. What happens when either side fails to conform to the others’ API spec? Does it use TCP or UDP?