Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Organic chemistry seems like a discipline better done by chemists than forward deployed staff with their payoff function sharply truncated at an IPO which at this point may or may not happen on schedule.

He seems to have gone out of his way too alienate just about any demographic likely to buy an EV...

I like and have come to, on certain policies and candidates, ally with Mamdani. But I’m struggling to find the relevance to New York City in this article beyond supposition. I went in ready to find a foreign attack on our homeland and come away grasping at straws.

If other investors are irrational that's a wonderful arbitrage opportunity. But good arbitrage opportunities are rare and don't last very long, so maybe they are rational.

For the same reason GP posted and half the stdlib is written in C: Python is a language that is almost always good enough, but never really the best (and especially when it comes to performance of complex algorithms).

Finally happened! Thanks for the heads up.

Yeah C# is getting a bit unwidely.


Most people aren't even aware that it's possible to turn them off.

Not hyperbolic, just incomplete ... this drug inhibits the KRAS mutation that is the "master switch" for 90% of pancreatic cancers and 50% of colon cancers. KRAS was considered "undruggable" so this is a huge breakthrough which is why oncologists gave a standing ovation for nearly a minute in the middle of a talk, with some of them in tears.

Yes, if you're savvy enough to know to stick to sunscreens that contain zinc oxide as the only ingredient (I don't think most people are), and don't mind looking like a ghost (the white cast) or getting white marks on your clothes, this is a safe and effective option. If you aren't checking the ingredients lists carefully, like most people aren't, and you don't know that most sunscreen-containing products in the US are hormone disruptors, like most people don't, your health is at risk.

I largely agree, but I have to call out your using "autistic" as in insult - please don't, there's a wide array of other options to choose from.

The stat you read is flat out inaccurate. There are 60 minutes where the clock is running, and the vast majority of that is with the ball live and in play. I would say something like 45+ minutes out of the 60. Also, in fairness I've been to a couple of NFL games, and the commercial breaks tend to happen when the game clock is paused by the flow of the game anyway (team calls timeout, referees are reviewing a play, and so on). It's uncommon for the game at the stadium to be stopped waiting for the broadcasters to show their commercials.

I'm no expert, and don't know if it applies in this case, but for a cancer I had (lymphoma) I was told that aggressive can often be easier to treat or "cure" (as defined by survival rates, etc.) since it also can often be hit more brutally by the treatments.

Anyway, since many in my family have died from this horrible cancer, its fantastic news to hear of any improvements there.


A disappointing trend is to frame the opposing argument in extreme terms rather than engaging with the substance of the assertion.

The latter portion is grand standing about how incredulous the commenter is that someone might trust an LLM company about the strength of their harnesses' if-then-else statements for request routing.

Why bother with an unsubstantial comment?


A decade ago surely, in 2026 I doubt it.

With Android, iDevices, PlayStation, Switch, and everyone that had proprietary compilers down using downstream forks from clang, due to the more appealing license.

Who is left still using GCC, other than existing projects lacking a clang backend for a snowflake embed CPU?

In any case, if it is a modern GCC release past 2012, it was compiled with C++ as well.


If it is worth trying out, it is worth writing the README for.

Ah but that is expensive and introduces risk of being caught doing clandestine. It is much more convenient to just use the one already installed and accepted.

In fact, put away all this physical access nonsense and just buy it from the data broker.


this is cool!

`qwen-35b-3a` is really garbage (I know well because it's what I run locally). What quant are you running? Would people really pay $6 a month for it even if unlimited?

That said, nice looking site and wish you the best for getting it off the ground.


I did, the problem is that

1. There can be massive differences between chips which sounds plausibly same and thanks to the way how LLM is working, models are mangling these variations together

2. Registers are often named in very way similar across different manufacturers so models are making up registers in MPC5555 which are coincidentally registers in Renesas processors doing same thing.

3. There are no standard in reference manuals, sometimes there are literally missing chunks of knowledge thanks to translation to English or there are pieces which you can only get from Application Notes which has code as a screenshot.

And then you will find out that all those descriptions are wrong and through trial and error you will get it working in 2 weeks time.

Bonus point: Random people having public Git repositories for obscure processors, but with bad or completely non working implementation of drivers for them. However LLM will just output variation of this garbage on you, because there are 3 public repositories on the whole internet. Sometimes I have a feeling that this must be on purpose to poison the well.


It’s not silly. I’m responding to this:

> If data about the public is so dangerous that we must disguise the results, then perhaps its data we shouldn’t be collecting in the first place.

We agree that doxxing is dangerously online yes? Your point about the white pages is exactly what I’m talking about. A piece of data isn’t inherently dangerous or not dangerous. It’s about context and ease of access by actors with various intentions.


>Everything in reality is animated. Nothing instantaneously snaps between two states.

That's precisely why a GUI should not be animated. No matter how I operate it, the action I use already has its own animation, e.g. my finger moving on the mouse. If I add another animation in the GUI itself that's double animation. It's equivalent to pressing a button and triggering a servo to automatically press that same button.


Thanks - link updated, went ahead and just percent-encoded the damn thing.

For reference - it's a Gamecube game where the other players play as ghosts released all the way back in 2003.


Make it $200/month subscription which actually gives you access to O($1K) worth of codex compute. Even at the face value it is very generous, IMO.

I'm feeling strong alignment with your perspective here. Thanks

Not really, given that GCC no longer compiles with a pure C compiler.

Unless of course, you don't have anything to do, and feel like bootstraping GCC 16, using a compiler chain all the way back to 2012 thereabouts.


I see that intelligence itself is a tool, but that doesn't mean I want an automated gun, automated hammer, automated nuclear warhead, etc.

it's a feature, not a bug

This is probably using AI to remove a background or object from an image, not a 6 finger perp.

“Lots of forensics is much more dubious than CSI would have you believe.” was what was being replied to.

Sounds very unlikely in practice. Any evidence anyone actually tried to deanonymize this data for this purpose?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: