(too late to edit above) The haskell wiki link is not adequate, relative to the ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		gtani on Oct 18, 2011 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Not Haskell? (too late to edit above) The haskell wiki link is not adequate, relative to the RW Haskell hard copy index (not avail. online unfortunately), which starts with 1.3 pages of symbol function names (and is missing a few relatively common QuickCheck symbol names). I was looking for something like the Scala staircase book, first edition freely available online, which has a complete list for that language.

teaspoon on Oct 18, 2011 [–]

Whatever symbols you're seeing in RWH that aren't on that wiki page are probably functions, not keywords. For functions, you should use Hoogle.

For better or worse, there will never be a complete list of infix functions for Haskell because new infix functions can be defined by the user.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact