Historically without any facts I'd say that men have long been steered towards STEM related roles, whereas females have not. Purely as a long standing historical change in roles for Women vs roles for Men, there have been traditional roles for females vs males, however this is shifting.
There are so many reasons for this that I'm probably not best to talk to it. The important thing is that these things are changing to provide more choice.
Historically, in fact, men were leading computing projects and "in charge" of giant room sized computers while the girly details of programming and getting stuff done on a daily basis by the hour went to women.
eg: Steve Shirley
In the 1950s, she worked at the Post Office Research Station at Dollis Hill, building computers from scratch and writing code in machine language. She took evening classes for six years to obtain an honours degree in mathematics. In 1959, she moved to CDL Ltd, designers of the ICT 1301 computer.
After her marriage to physicist Derek Shirley in 1959, Shirley founded the software company Freelance Programmers with a capital of £6. Having experienced sexism in her workplace, "being fondled, being pushed against the wall", she wanted to create job opportunities for women with dependents, and predominantly employed women, with only three male programmers in the first 300 staff, until the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 made that practice illegal.
It kind of does, that an attacker can rely on something a small as a Bluetooth name to cause disruption based on employees following policy out of fear of being fired.
I've found it to be that people simply go back to their old ways. Many people are busy and unless they're being actively pushed to change it they feel they only have time to do things the way they have been doing them.
Using AI requires skills to know how to use it, particularly agents then it requires the time to build an improved way of doing things.
I think of it like giving someone excel in the beginning and expecting they know how to use it, when the rest of their team doesn't, they don't have the skills to know how to use it and how it can benefit them.
I really have to disagree with the broad brush statement.
Wikipedia is an incredible resource and yes given its model it is maintained and moderated by volunteers, which has meant during particular global events the Wikipedia articles associated are subject to potential changes representing misinformation that requires the volunteers to moderate through.
If systems are scraping this information and they don't have processes to correct itself then that's not the fault of Wikipedia, but the fault of those tools blindly scraping the data and serving it.
Wikipedia is an incredible resource. Wikipedia doesn't poison global knowledge, it is a knowledge source that changes over time and is subject to bias like anything. If you scrape this information and use it as gospel without assessing its bias or updating it based on changes then the LLM's are knowingly serving information that they know might be incorrect.
I should add that the information you get out of an AI tool is also based on your prompt, if you ask it for information relating to Gaza, you should ask it for an independent view that covers multiple knowledge sources to help mitigate these issues.
I agree that clearly there are areas with factual inaccuracies on Wikipedia and I'm not sure on what the solution is to resolve it, I also don't see this article coming up with a solution either. Okay move to a different platform, but as that platform grows it will become a similar target for the exact issues mentioned.
I don't understand the idea of the doors opening that way.
How do two people get in at the same time? Both go for the door handle right next to each other then let the other get in first because there's not enough room for two to get in at the same time on one side.
Historically without any facts I'd say that men have long been steered towards STEM related roles, whereas females have not. Purely as a long standing historical change in roles for Women vs roles for Men, there have been traditional roles for females vs males, however this is shifting.
There are so many reasons for this that I'm probably not best to talk to it. The important thing is that these things are changing to provide more choice.
reply